Forthcoming

Surgical Management and Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Current Concepts and Strategies

Authors

  • Daniel Encarnacion-Santos, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia
  • Gennady Chmutin, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia
  • Egor Chmutin, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia
  • Ariel Tapia Sierra, MD Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic, University Teaching Hospital, Dr. Dario Contreras, Santo Domingo, Este, Dominican Republic
  • Shahboz Boboev Ibrohimovich, MD Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Medical Institute, FSAOU IN RUDN
  • Emmanuel Batista-Geraldino, MD Department of Neurosurgery, University teaching Hospital, Juan Pablo Pina, San Cristóbal, Dominican Republic
  • Adam Mainer Romanovish, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia
  • Peter Magembe, MD Department of Orthopedics and Spine Surgery, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre Hospital, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56929/jseaortho-2026-0317

Keywords:

Spinal tuberculosis, anterior approach, posterior approach, laminectomy, decompression, spinal fusion and clinical outcomes, Pott’s disease

Abstract

Background: Spinal tuberculosis, also known as Pott’s disease, accounts for nearly half of all musculoskeletal tuberculosis cases and is the most common form in children and young adults. Its incidence is increasing in developed countries. This study aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes, from percutaneous biopsy to anterior and posterior spinal decompression, in patients with spinal tuberculosis and kyphosis through different surgical procedures and the expectation of clinical outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across ScienceDirect, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software and Excel (PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420261327294). The search terms included “spinal tuberculosis” and its management, surgical techniques, and associated outcomes related to morbidity and mortality, as well as related pathologies. Inclusion criteria were limited to English-language studies published between January 2012 and September 2025.

Results: In this review, a total of 2,710 patients with spinal tuberculosis were identified. Of these, 1,010 patients (37%) were analyzed for surgical approach; 439 (16%) underwent a posterior approach, and 554 (20%) underwent an anterior approach. Regarding diagnostic methods, among 1,700 patients (63%), 867 (32%) underwent histopathological examination, 1,211 (44%) had smear testing, and 858 (31%) were tested using GeneXpert.

Conclusions: Spinal tuberculosis remains complex in both diagnosis and surgical management. Well-executed anterior or posterior approaches are effective for kyphosis correction and spinal cord decompression. However, biopsy performed post-laminectomy through paravertebral or multifidus muscle incisions carries a higher risk of sample contamination compared with alternative techniques.

Author Biographies

Gennady Chmutin, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia

Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Department of Neurosurgery "Peoples' of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia named after Patrice Lumumba" (RUDN) (RU)

Egor Chmutin, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education, "Peoples' Friendship” University, Moscow, Russia

Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Department of Neurosurgery "Peoples' of Friendship University, Moscow, Russia named after Patrice Lumumba" (RUDN) (RU)

Ariel Tapia Sierra, MD, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedic, University Teaching Hospital, Dr. Dario Contreras, Santo Domingo, Este, Dominican Republic

Department of Traumatology  and Orthopedics, University teaching Hospital, Dr. Dario Contreras, Santo Domingo, Este, Dominican Republic

Shahboz Boboev Ibrohimovich, MD, Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Medical Institute, FSAOU IN RUDN

Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery of the Medical Institute, FSAOU IN RUDN

Emmanuel Batista-Geraldino, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University teaching Hospital, Juan Pablo Pina, San Cristóbal, Dominican Republic

Department of Neurosurgery, University teaching Hospital, Juan Pablo Pina, San Cristóbal, Dominican Republic

References

Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: A review. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:440-54.

Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: a comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J 2019;19:1858-70.

Schirmer P, Renault CA, Holodniy M. Is spinal tuberculosis contagious? Int J Infect Dis 2010;14:e659-66.

Soares Do Brito J, Tirado A, Fernandes P. Surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis complicated with extensive abscess. Iowa Orthop J 2014;34:129-36.

Ruparel S, Tanaka M, Mehta R, et al. Surgical management of spinal tuberculosis—the past, present, and future. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:1307.

Srinivasa R, Furtado S, Kunikullaya K, et al. Surgical management of spinal tuberculosis - A retrospective observational study from a Tertiary Care Center in Karnataka. Asian J Neurosurg 2021;16:695-700.

Pu X, Zhou Q, He Q, et al. A posterior versus anterior surgical approach in combination with debridement, interbody autografting and instrumentation for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. Int Orthop 2012;36:307-13.

Yuliang D, Li Y, Wang B, et al. Anterior versus posterior surgery for mono-segmental thoracic spinal tuberculosis: selection of the optimal approach and comparison of outcomes. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017;10:10463-71

Li W, Liu Z, Xiao X, et al. Comparison of anterior transthoracic debridement and fusion with posterior transpedicular debridement and fusion in the treatment of mid-thoracic spinal tuberculosis in adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:570.

Musali SR, Karla R, Gollapudi PR, et al. Anterolateral versus posterolateral decompression and spinal stabilization in thoracolumbar Potts spine: A comparative study. Br J Neurosurg 2023;37:1028-30.

Zhao C, Luo L, Liu L, et al. Surgical management of consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: Anterior-only approach vs. posterior-only approach. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:343.

Jiang L, Sheng X, Deng Z et al. A comparative study of one-stage posterior unilateral limited laminectomy vs. bilateral laminectomy debridement and bone grafting fusion combined with internal fixation for the treatment of aged patients with single-segment spinal tuberculosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022;23:619.

Qiu J, Peng Y, Qiu X, et al. Comparison of anterior or posterior approach in surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Surg 2022;22:161.

Wu H, Cui Y, Gong L, et al. Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;142:3643-9

Garg B, Kandwal P, Nagaraja UB, et al. Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:165-70.

Shi J, Tang X, Xu Y, et al. Single-stage internal fixation for thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis using 4 different surgical approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:E247-57.

Wang X, Pang X, Wu P, et al. One-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation vs. single posterior debridement, bone grafting, and instrumentation for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Eur Spine J 2014;23:830-7.

Huang Y, Lin J, Chen X, et al. A posterior versus anterior debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation for lumbar and thoracic tuberculosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2017;12:150.

Wang G, Dong W, Lan T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy evaluation of the conventional and molecular tests for Spinal Tuberculosis in a cohort, head-to-head study. Emerg Microbes Infect 2018;7:109.

Shetty A, Raut S, Anand M, et al. Detection of Spinal TB Infection: A Retrospective Study Evaluating Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of AFB Smear, Gene Expert, Histopathology, Culture Sensitivity and LPA Tests From a Biopsy Sample. Int J Spine 2022;7:1-6.

Jagiasi JD, Mehta P, Ubale TV, et al. How expert is genexpert test: A study done at a tertiary care centre for TB spine patients. Int J Orthop Sci 2020;6:476-8.

Massi MN, Biatko KT, Handayani I et al. Evaluation of rapid GeneXpert MTB/RIF method using DNA tissue specimens of vertebral bones in patients with suspected spondylitis TB J Orthop 2017;14:189-91.

Arockiaraj J, Michael JS, Amritanand R, et al. The role of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of tubercular spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:3162-9.

Karthek V, Bhilare P, Hadgaonkar S, et al. Gene Xpert/MTB RIF assay for spinal tuberculosis- sensitivity, specificity and clinical utility. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021;16:233-8.

Qi Y, Liu Z, Liu X, et al. Tuberculosis-Specific Antigen/Phytohemagglutinin Ratio Combined With GeneXpert MTB/RIF for Early Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:781315.

Zhou Z, Zheng Y, Wang L. Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for bone and joint tuberculosis using tissue specimens. Int J Infect Dis 2021;105:224-9.

Yu Y, Kong Y, Ye J, et al. Performance of conventional histopathology and GeneXpert MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis from bone specimens: A prospective clinical study. Clin Biochem 2020;85:33-7.

Li Z, Wang J, Xiu X, et al. Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for spinal tuberculosis infection. BMC Infect Dis 2023;23:695.

Held M, Laubscher M, Zar HJ, et al. GeneXpert polymerase chain reaction for spinal tuberculosis: an accurate and rapid diagnostic test. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1366-9.

Solanki AM, Basu S, Biswas A, Roy S, Banta A. Sensitivity and Specificity of Gene Xpert in the Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study. Global Spine J 2020;10:553-8.

Guha M, Lal H, Boruah T, et al. Clinico- radio-histopathological correlation by c-arm image-guided biopsy in spinal tuberculosis. Indian J Orthop 2021;55:1028-36.

Li Y, Wang Y, Ding H, et al. Pathologic characteristics of spinal tuberculosis: analysis of 181 cases. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2020;13:1253-61.

Khanna K, Sabharwal S. Spinal tuberculosis: a comprehensive review for the modern spine surgeon. Spine J 2019;19:1858-70.

Na S, Lyu Z, Zhang S. Diagnosis and treatment of skipped multifocal spinal tuberculosis lesions. Orthop Surg 2023;15:1454-67.

Encarnación-Santos D, Valerievich KA, Scalia G, et al. Spondylodiscitis: Understanding pathophysiology, surgical strategies, and postoperative management - A single-center study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2024;15:185-9.

Encarnacion Santos D, Nurmukhametov R, Donasov M, et al. Management of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A retrospective analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2024;15:99-104.

Santos DE, Bozkurt I, Nurmukhametov R, et al. The future of minimally invasive spine surgery in low-income Latin American countries. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2024;60:35.

Qureshi R, Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, et al. Perioperative management of blood loss in spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:383-8.

Degoute CS. Controlled hypotension: A guide to drug choice. Drugs 2007;67:1053-76.

Jamaliya RH, Chinnachamy R, Maliwad J, et al. The efficacy and hemodynamic response to Dexmedetomidine as a hypotensive agent in posterior fixation surgery following traumatic spine injury. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;30:203-7.

Ruku R, Jamwal A, Bhadrala N, et al. Randomized open-labeled comparative evaluation of the efficacy of nitroglycerine, esmolol, and dexmedetomidine in producing controlled hypotension in spine surgeries. Anesth Essays Res 2019;13:486-91.

Ghodraty MR, Homaee MM, Farazmehr K. Comparative induction of controlled circulation by magnesium and remifentanil in spine surgery. World J Orthop 2014;5:51-6.

Nazir O, Wani MA, Ali N, et al. Use of dexmedetomidine and esmolol for hypotension in lumbar spine surgery. Trauma Mon 2016;21:e22078.

Hwang W, Kim E. The effect of milrinone on induced hypotension in elderly patients during spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J 2014;14:1532-7.

Crescenzi G, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Desmopressin Reduces Transfusion Needs after Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Anesthesiology 2008;109:1063-76.

Li G, Sun TW, Luo G, et al. Efficacy of antifibrinolytic agents on surgical bleeding and transfusion requirements in spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:140-54.

Theusinger OM, Spahn DR. Perioperative blood conservation strategies for major spine surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2016;30:41-52.

Chilkoti GT, Jain N, Mohta M, et al. Perioperative concerns in Pott’s spine: A review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020;36:443-9.

Dunn RN, Ben Husien M. Spinal tuberculosis: review of current management. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:425-31.

Bruchfeld J, Correia-Neves M, Källenius G. Tuberculosis and HIV coinfection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2015;5:a017871.

Ding C, Hu M, Shangguan Y, et al. Epidemic trends in high tuberculosis burden countries during the last three decades and feasibility of achieving the global targets at the country level. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022;9:798465.

Bell LCK, Noursadeghi M. Pathogenesis of HIV-1 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis co-infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018;16:80-90.

Lu YJ, Barreira-Silva P, Boyce S, et al. CD4 T cell help prevents CD8 T cell exhaustion and promotes control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Cell Rep 2021;36:109696.

Latorre I, Martínez-Lacasa X, Font R, et al. IFN-γ response on T-cell based assays in HIV-infected patients for detection of tuberculosis infection. BMC Infect Dis 2010;10:348.

Montales MT, Chaudhury A, Beebe A, et al. HIV-associated TB syndemic: A growing clinical challenge worldwide. Front Public Health 2015:3:281.

Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:817-31.

Zhao C, Luo L, Liu L, et al. Surgical management of consecutive multisegment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: anterior-only approach vs. posterior-only approach. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:343.

Yang P, Zang Q, Kang J, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety among three surgical approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016;25:3862-74.

Zhu Z, Hao D, Wang B, et al. Selection of surgical treatment approaches for cervicothoracic spinal tuberculosis: A 10-year case review. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192581.

Wu WJ, Tang Y, Lyu JT, et al. Clinical efficacy of three surgical approaches for the treatment of cervicothoracic tuberculosis: A multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Surg 2020;12:1579-88.

Sun D, Zhang ZH, Mei G, et al. Comparison of anterior only and combined anterior and posterior approach in treating lumbosacral tuberculosis. Sci Rep 2019;9:18475.

Wu W, Lyu J, Liu X, et al. Surgical treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis: a multicenter retrospective study. World Neurosurg 2018;110:e842-50.

Qureshi MA, Khalique AB, Afzal W, et al. Surgical management of contiguous multilevel thoracolumbar tuberculous spondylitis. Eur Spine J 2013; 22 Suppl 4:618-23.

Fisahn C, Alonso F, Hasan GA, et al. Trends in spinal surgery for Pott’s disease (2000-2016): An overview and bibliometric study. Global Spine J 2017;7:821-8.

May TW, Pfäfflin M. The efficacy of an educational treatment program for patients with epilepsy (MOSES): Results of a controlled, randomized study. Epilepsia 2002;43:539-49.

Gao Q, Han C, Romani MD, et al. Posterior-only debridement, internal fixation, and interbody fusion using titanium mesh in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis with spinal epidural abscess: a minimum 5-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021;22:917.

Zeng Y, Chen Z, Qi Q, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of posterior surgical correction for the treatment of moderate to severe post-tuberculosis kyphosis in 36 cases with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;16:351-8.

Luo C, Wang X, Wu P, et al. Single-stage transpedicular decompression, debridement, posterior instrumentation, and fusion for thoracic tuberculosis with kyphosis and spinal cord compression in aged individuals. Spine J 2016;16:154-62

Huang Y, Lin J, Chen X, et al. A posterior versus anterior debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation for lumbar and thoracic tuberculosis. J Orthop Surg Res 2017;12:150.

Qiu J, Peng Y, Qiu X, et al. Comparison of anterior or posterior approach in surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Surg 2022;22:161.

Zhao C, Pu X, Zhou Q, et al. Can a posterior approach effectively heal thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis? Microbiology outcomes of the operative area. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:24.

Gao Y, Ou Y, Deng Q, et al. Comparison between titanium mesh and autogenous iliac bone graft to restore vertebral height through posterior approach for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0175567.

Santos DE, Bozkurt I, Pachev M, et al. Degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis: A comprehensive systematic review in diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Oman Med J [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 26]; Available from: https://omjournal.org/articleDetails.aspx?coType=2&aId=3916

Encarnación-Santos D, Chmutin G, Chmutin E, et al. Lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis: comparative insights into patient selection, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes. Sri Lanka j Surg 2025;43:25-32.

Encarnacion-Santos D, Nurmukhametov R, Bozkurt I, et al.. Restoring vertebral height in the treatment of multilevel vertebral compression fractures with vertebroplasty. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2023;59:135.

Encarnación-Santos D, Chmutin G, Bozkurt I, et al. Letter to the editor regarding “minimally invasive spine surgery: An overview.” World Neurosurg 2024;184:353-4.

Zeng H, Shen X, Luo C, et al. Comparison of three surgical approaches for cervicothoracic spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case-control study. J Orthop Surg Res 2015;10:100.

Xu Z, Zhang Z, Wang X, et al. Medium‐term follow‐up outcomes of one‐stage posterior lumbosacral or lumbopelvic fixation in the management of lumbosacral junction tuberculosis in adults. Orthop Surg 2021;13:2051-60.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

1.
Encarnación-Santos D, Chmutin G, Chmutin E, Tapia Sierra A, Boboev Ibrohimovich S, Batista-Geraldino E, Mainer Romanovish A, Magembe P. Surgical Management and Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Current Concepts and Strategies. JseaOrtho [Internet]. 2026 May 30 [cited 2026 Jun. 1];. Available from: http://27.254.142.215/index.php/jsao/article/view/317

Issue

Section

Review Articles